![]() |
Global Military Spending Closing on Cold War Peak
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20050607/ts_ ... pending_dc
Kinda disturbing. I was extremely surprised that Russia is only spending 19 billion on their military, I mean the Russian Navy has never really been in the same league with the US navy or Royal Navy, but airforce has usually been decent and the army was, I was under the impression, one of the best in the world... |
Humans spend to much time and effort killing one another.
|
we just boosted to like 20 billion think
|
Quote:
|
i dunno if your joking or not...but there aren't any fighters in canada that are prop driven. We have f-18's.
Anyway, snowbirds are prop driven, but their arieal stunt team. CC-130's use props. A lot of planes use props. The US airforce have planes with Props because they use 130's and many other planes like that as well. http://www.airforce.forces.gc.ca/equip/equip1_e.asp As for global military spending, it is really disturbing that so much of this money is spent on military. Military expenditures far outweigh education, health and other programs like that, which is in my mind, sad. Peacekeeping expenditures is something like 0.8% of total military expenditure. |
Quote:
[url:3178f]http://www.airforce.forces.gc.ca/equip/equip1_e.asp[/url:3178f] |
The military does more then just fight, thus the need for prop planes for special jobs, aka search and rescue.
|
Quote:
|
[quote="$p!k3":6942c]
Quote:
[url:6942c]http://www.airforce.forces.gc.ca/equip/equip1_e.asp[/url:6942c][/quote:6942c] Uhm... Im pretty sure most armys in the world use prop planes for various reasons. IE., the Swedish Airforce has the C130 Hercules, FSR (radarplane), DC3, etc, etc. There are heaps of uses for propplanes. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:26 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by ScriptzBin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 1998 - 2007 by Rudedog Productions | All trademarks used are properties of their respective owners. All rights reserved.