North Korea Demands Nuke Reactor From U.S.
 

http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u ... ea_reactor

rolleyes:

how many of you think that this will EVER happen

Canada gave India a nuclear reactor, which some say was a direct result of their nuclear weapons program, so it could happen, but I doubt it. Certainly the US won't. Maybe some other country.

Ill bet the under on this one

wont happen. And when it doesnt happen N. Korea will resume its nuke program, or they will try to buy some time with continued talks etc(I have a whole theory about this but i wont post it cuz all of u will think im paranoid. oOo: )

It doesnt matter, if they do resume with the nukes (which they will) the US is not in harms way. They dont have a missle that is capable to reach US soil. They cant get here other than FedEx

unless they get one from China

[quote="Sgt>Stackem":30df6]It doesnt matter, if they do resume with the nukes (which they will) the US is not in harms way. They dont have a missle that is capable to reach US soil. They cant get here other than FedEx[/quote:30df6]technology doesnt stand still. Today they can strike at japan, tommorrow they can strike at the US.

Interesting development. Check this out.
http://news.yahoo.com/fc/world/north_korea

those people are whacky, why would the US do that? Kim Suks Dong, or what ever his name is delusional

fuck im tired of these fags, lets just call their bluff already. send the 8th air force to bomb their rubber dog shit and bamboo umbrella factories for teh win

[quote="Sgt>Stackem":66682]It doesnt matter, if they do resume with the nukes (which they will) the US is not in harms way. They dont have a missle that is capable to reach US soil. They cant get here other than FedEx[/quote:66682]And Iraq did? Im not trying to change the subject but eek:

US already has a contingency plan to attack Iran using nukes, so why not North Korea? Cheney already said if another 9/11 type attack happens, the US has the right to attack Iran, whether they are involved or not.


[quote="From the August 1 Issue of The American Conservative":4df87]In Washington it is hardly a secret that the same people in and around the administration who brought you Iraq are preparing to do the same for Iran. The Pentagon, acting under instructions from Vice President Dick Cheney’s office, has tasked the United States Strategic Command (STRATCOM) with drawing up a contingency plan to be employed in response to another 9/11-type terrorist attack on the United States. The [b]plan includes a large-scale air assault on Iran employing both conventional and tactical nuclear weapons.[/b] Within Iran there are more than 450 major strategic targets, including numerous suspected nuclear-weapons-program development sites. Many of the targets are hardened or are deep underground and could not be taken out by conventional weapons, hence the nuclear option. [b]As in the case of Iraq, the response is not conditional on Iran actually being involved in the act of terrorism directed against the United States[/b]. Several senior Air Force officers involved in the planning are reportedly appalled at the implications of what they are doing—that Iran is being set up for an unprovoked nuclear attack—but no one is prepared to damage his career by posing any objections.[/quote:4df87]
[url="http://www.amconmag.com/2005_08_01/article3.html"]http://www.amconmag.com/2005_08_01/article3.html[/url]

This is from a Conservative magazine, so you can't call this "Liberal bias" or anything of that sort.

[quote=ninty]US already has a contingency plan to attack Iran using nukes, so why not North Korea? Cheney already said if another 9/11 type attack happens, the US has the right to attack Iran, whether they are involved or not.


[quote="From the August 1 Issue of The American Conservative":bab8e]In Washington it is hardly a secret that the same people in and around the administration who brought you Iraq are preparing to do the same for Iran. The Pentagon, acting under instructions from Vice President Dick Cheney’s office, has tasked the United States Strategic Command (STRATCOM) with drawing up a contingency plan to be employed in response to another 9/11-type terrorist attack on the United States. The [b]plan includes a large-scale air assault on Iran employing both conventional and tactical nuclear weapons.[/b] Within Iran there are more than 450 major strategic targets, including numerous suspected nuclear-weapons-program development sites. Many of the targets are hardened or are deep underground and could not be taken out by conventional weapons, hence the nuclear option. [b]As in the case of Iraq, the response is not conditional on Iran actually being involved in the act of terrorism directed against the United States[/b]. Several senior Air Force officers involved in the planning are reportedly appalled at the implications of what they are doing—that Iran is being set up for an unprovoked nuclear attack—but no one is prepared to damage his career by posing any objections.[/quote]
[url="http://www.amconmag.com/2005_08_01/article3.html"]http://www.amconmag.com/2005_08_01/article3.html[/url]

This is from a Conservative magazine, so you can't call this "Liberal bias" or anything of that sort.[/quote:bab8e]

Fucking insane.

[quote=Tripper][quote=ninty]US already has a contingency plan to attack Iran using nukes, so why not North Korea? Cheney already said if another 9/11 type attack happens, the US has the right to attack Iran, whether they are involved or not.


Fucking insane.[/quote:73a08] ed: what tripper said ed:

Here we go again.