![]() |
http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.html?i=1583&p=6
Notice it's actually SLOWER than a Geforce 3? Check out these benchmarks: http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.html?i=1583&p=7 http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.html?i=1583&p=9 http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.html?i=1583&p=10 http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.html?i=1583&p=11 http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.html?i=1583&p=12 http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.html?i=1583&p=13 |
John Carmack said some stuff about the vid card couple weeks ago as well.
On the topic of current Nvidia cards: Do not buy a GeForce4-MX for Doom. Nvidia has really made a mess of the naming conventions here. I always thought it was bad enough that GF2 was just a speed bumped GF1, while GF3 had significant architectural improvements over GF2. I expected GF4 to be the speed bumped GF3, but calling the NV17 GF4-MX really sucks. GF4-MX will still run Doom properly, but it will be using the NV10 codepath with only two texture units and no vertex shaders. A GF3 or 8500 will be much better performers. The GF4-MX may still be the card of choice for many people depending on pricing, especially considering that many games won't use four textures and vertex programs, but damn, I wish they had named it something else. As usual, there will be better cards available from both Nvidia and ATI by the time we ship the game. http://www.bluesnews.com/cgi-bin/fin...20020211223659 Moved to Off-Topic forum |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:16 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by ScriptzBin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 1998 - 2007 by Rudedog Productions | All trademarks used are properties of their respective owners. All rights reserved.