Alliedassault - View Single Post - The bloodiest, most devastaing battle of WW2...

IwoJima · 06-21-2001, 01:27 AM

Listen punks, im sick of the people who say without a doubt that the normandy campaign was the bloodiest of the war. It by far was not. The only beach considered out of the five that was a disaster was omaha beach taken by the american 29th and 1st divisions. And about 2500 casuaties mounted. Battles on the eastern front and in the pacific were far worse.Anyone who says, oh normandy was the worst, knows truly little about world war 2 itself, and only about the game, mohaa.

	(#9)
IwoJima is Offline Junior Member Posts: 5 Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Abbotsford, B.C, Canada	06-21-2001, 01:27 AM Listen punks, im sick of the people who say without a doubt that the normandy campaign was the bloodiest of the war. It by far was not. The only beach considered out of the five that was a disaster was omaha beach taken by the american 29th and 1st divisions. And about 2500 casuaties mounted. Battles on the eastern front and in the pacific were far worse.Anyone who says, oh normandy was the worst, knows truly little about world war 2 itself, and only about the game, mohaa.