Alliedassault - View Single Post - Should the U.S. invade Iraq? (all opinions welcome)

Chronic Diarrhea · **Should the U.S. invade Iraq? (all opinions welcome) -** 10-24-2002, 03:05 PM

Okay, ladies and gents, I am making a speech in my speech class about why the U.S. should wage war against Iraq in a few weeks and I would like to hear your opinions on if you agree or not. I think the U.S. should invade Iraq in order to:

A) Remove Saddam Hussein from power

B) Inspect Iraq (very closely) once more to find weaps. of m. destruction, including biological, chemical, and nuclear (not likely), and destroy any that are found.

C) To protect Americans and any of our allies from any more acts of terror that Hussein has been involved in.

It has been believed that Hussein had a factor in the WTC 93' bombing and the OKC bombing. This is just theory but there are many incriminating pieces of evidence that Hussein and/or Iraq had a hand in these two acts. Of course we all know Hussein was behind most of the car and embassy bombings in the past.

If So-Damn-Insane does in fact have weaps. of m. destruction, then I believe he will indefinitely try to attack the U.S. He has not done so in the past because all of the previous SCUD missiles he had in the past did not have the ability to travel from Iraq to the U.S. I don't know if Iraq has any nuclear-capable submarines, but I would have to guess that he doesn't, otherwise he would have attacked.

Let's say that Hussein has been telling the truth and does not have any WMD in his possession. If we invade Iraq and find out that he has no WMD, then yes it is VERY bad publicity on the U.S.'s part and I think that's why we have not done so already. But think about it, if we assume that Hussein has no WMD, then we are putting millions of American citizen's lives at grave danger. Hussein is evil enough to want to kill millions of innocents. Hell, he has already done that to his own people. I think that's pretty sick, and I sure don't wanna be a wuss about it and not take action to prevent Iraq from causing any more problems.

Finally, I would like it if everybody expressed their opinions on this matter seriously without any degrading of the U.S. or Canada or England or any country and without flaming anybody for their own opinions. I wrote this because this is work, and I take my work seriously, so no flaming please.

	(#1)
Chronic Diarrhea is Offline 1st Lieutenant Posts: 4,318 Join Date: Jun 2002	Should the U.S. invade Iraq? (all opinions welcome) - 10-24-2002, 03:05 PM Okay, ladies and gents, I am making a speech in my speech class about why the U.S. should wage war against Iraq in a few weeks and I would like to hear your opinions on if you agree or not. I think the U.S. should invade Iraq in order to: A) Remove Saddam Hussein from power B) Inspect Iraq (very closely) once more to find weaps. of m. destruction, including biological, chemical, and nuclear (not likely), and destroy any that are found. C) To protect Americans and any of our allies from any more acts of terror that Hussein has been involved in. It has been believed that Hussein had a factor in the WTC 93' bombing and the OKC bombing. This is just theory but there are many incriminating pieces of evidence that Hussein and/or Iraq had a hand in these two acts. Of course we all know Hussein was behind most of the car and embassy bombings in the past. If So-Damn-Insane does in fact have weaps. of m. destruction, then I believe he will indefinitely try to attack the U.S. He has not done so in the past because all of the previous SCUD missiles he had in the past did not have the ability to travel from Iraq to the U.S. I don't know if Iraq has any nuclear-capable submarines, but I would have to guess that he doesn't, otherwise he would have attacked. Let's say that Hussein has been telling the truth and does not have any WMD in his possession. If we invade Iraq and find out that he has no WMD, then yes it is VERY bad publicity on the U.S.'s part and I think that's why we have not done so already. But think about it, if we assume that Hussein has no WMD, then we are putting millions of American citizen's lives at grave danger. Hussein is evil enough to want to kill millions of innocents. Hell, he has already done that to his own people. I think that's pretty sick, and I sure don't wanna be a wuss about it and not take action to prevent Iraq from causing any more problems. Finally, I would like it if everybody expressed their opinions on this matter seriously without any degrading of the U.S. or Canada or England or any country and without flaming anybody for their own opinions. I wrote this because this is work, and I take my work seriously, so no flaming please.