View Single Post
Old
  (#6)
Miscguy is Offline
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 3,811
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Redmond, Home of Microsoft
  Send a message via MSN to Miscguy  
Default 11-02-2002, 08:44 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Snipa
There was very little British in the game and no Russians.
I was unaware that the russians fought on the western front. I had no clue they were involved with the landings at normandy, or any mission in the original game. I can understand the complaint about the british and canadians (supposedly all allied nations are displayed in spearhead). But the focus of the game, normandy and beyond on the western side the russians had nothing to do with.

Perhaps a better name is what your bitching about. How do

Medal of Honor: American Assualt
Medal of Honor: American Invasion
Medal of Honor: Only the Americans do Shit in This Game

Sound? Get over it its a game. Its not meant to be politically correct. If it were you would not be killings Germans/Nazi's. Because this day and age thats not PC.

[quote:48095]They won WWI for us. (never mind they coward behind "neutrailty" until 1917... it started in 1914)

They won WWII for us as well. (never mention to a Yank the fact WWII began in September '39 and not as they believe that "date in infamy" Dec 7th 1941)[/quote:48095]

Who was winning before 1914? No one. After? Allies.

Who was winning before 41? No one. Germans had stalled and Britian was defending it self without means to mount a proper offensive. After? Allied victory.

So what i see, is the Americans joining a war and giving such an overwhelming amount of power to the "allied" side that it in the end wins the war.

I wont mention that WW2 wasnt over until the Japanese had been defeated, with no "allied" personel used.

Perhaps we pick on Sadam because he has oil. China. No oil. N Korea. No oil. Russia, there no longer communist and are working to be a better country. To say there not trusted is a personal opinion. A few people in Russia can t be trusted but the country as a whole can be.

Or perhaps its because we dont want to start WW3. N. Korea, backed by China. Sadam, backed by... So we blow up N Korea, piss China off. By shear numbers China is a Challenge no country can take on by itself. Therefore the UN or "Allied" countries would need to join. Before you know it WW3. Perhaps foreign policy is designed to save the world from destroying itself. Sadam MAY have weapons of mass destruction, and does have the hatred to use them. N korea has them, no stopping it. Attack and piss them off and nukes start flying and we bomb the living piss out of them and WW3 is off and running.

Perhaps its time to realise that America polices the wrold because no one else will. Maybe they cant, maybe they cant talk as big as the US because they dont have the power to stand alone in a fight. Perhaps its time to realise without the US policing the world, the world would have massive wars all over the place. Hate us, love us, fear us, I dont care, as long as you respect us. We will cover your ass in extreme heat when the world is in turmoil. We are the only remaining massive super power, you may have to learn to deal with it.
  
Reply With Quote