View Single Post
Old
  (#58)
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
   
Default 11-07-2002, 11:00 AM

[quote="Cool Fool":85cdb][quote=Innoxx][quote=Gerard][quote="Recycled Spooge":85cdb][quote=Gerard]
Quote:
Originally Posted by "Recycled Spooge":85cdb
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gerard
Quote:
Originally Posted by "Recycled Spooge":85cdb
Quote:
Originally Posted by "Gerard":85cdb
Raven or fox interactive? Raven havn't made a decent game in a while now and fox interactive = eek:.
So..you don't like gore, and you never played NOLF and NOLF2...
Gore doesn't make a game so im not fussed about it.

As for fox interactive they had nothing to do with nolf 1 or 2. It was made by monolith games and published by sierra.
Could have sworn it said Fox Interactive on the box, but fine, Sierra it is. Now imagine Doom 3 without gore........yeah, thought so.
This isn't doom 3 though. I was probably one of the only people that didn't bitch about lack of gore on the original allied assault release. Gores just a dinky addition, you barely notice it after a while thus it has no impact on the game. [/quote:85cdb]
Yet doom without the gore would suck, don't you think? You just proved my point. SOF2 would also suck. When you have actual gore, you actually see the effect of your gun on the character, while if you don't have the gore, the character just falls over. Boring!!! MOH is a game about the bloodiest conflict in history.[/quote:85cdb]

Umm no, you conviently edited out a relevant part tof my post. I stated that id rather doom had no blood so i could see more of the character models. Sof2 blew anyyway because the whole game was hyped around the gore content.[/quote:85cdb]
I just want to see how long this quote can get.[/quote:85cdb]
my turn[/quote:85cdb]

we're going to get banned or this thread's gonna get closed oOo: would be hilarious if someone ran at you trying to smack you with a mg-42 angel:
  
Reply With Quote