Alliedassault - View Single Post

Hans · 08-21-2001, 07:26 AM

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by BallisticWookie:
I would personally prefer more single player. Dont get me wrong multiplayer will be great, thing is there are those of us who wont enjoy MP as much because of our absolutely shit connections and the fact that every few minutes you suffer from really bad lag or packetloss. Thats a great idea Albow/Ludy, I really hope 2015 take into consideration this kind of function, if not in the first release maybe in an update or addon pack ? The addition of a random map generator will add a completely new dimension for the SP game, not only would you be able to fight it out more with a squad, you may actually even be able to fight a full blown battle which would be fanstastic. Please think about it 2015/EA.

<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

I too feel that added single player experience is a great idea, but I also feel it cost far too much. From the example of SOF2, it has taken much resources and time from the development team, so much, that they had to omit Multiplayer. I know more single player is a very good thing, but I feel that Multiplayer, by it's allowing you to fight human opponents, gives a far less predictable challenge. Also, you have to think of all the kids (that's why EA wants TEEN rating) that will buy the game - no blood, maybe they can overlook it no multiplayer, the game gets thrown out the window - Some of you couldn't care less about the kids, but obviously EA does. I'd say, this is the kind of thing for an add-on, by then SOF2 will be out, and the developer will have an example to draw upon.

Anyway, thats how I feel about this whole thing, but I'm sure some of you would rather they just kick the kids in the ass, and take out Multiplayer. I think I'll just wait for the add-on.

------------------

El Presidente says "The future is near and will be ours!"

	(#12)
Hans is Offline Senior Member Posts: 1,160 Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Canada	08-21-2001, 07:26 AM <BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by BallisticWookie: I would personally prefer more single player. Dont get me wrong multiplayer will be great, thing is there are those of us who wont enjoy MP as much because of our absolutely shit connections and the fact that every few minutes you suffer from really bad lag or packetloss. Thats a great idea Albow/Ludy, I really hope 2015 take into consideration this kind of function, if not in the first release maybe in an update or addon pack ? The addition of a random map generator will add a completely new dimension for the SP game, not only would you be able to fight it out more with a squad, you may actually even be able to fight a full blown battle which would be fanstastic. Please think about it 2015/EA. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE> I too feel that added single player experience is a great idea, but I also feel it cost far too much. From the example of SOF2, it has taken much resources and time from the development team, so much, that they had to omit Multiplayer. I know more single player is a very good thing, but I feel that Multiplayer, by it's allowing you to fight human opponents, gives a far less predictable challenge. Also, you have to think of all the kids (that's why EA wants TEEN rating) that will buy the game - no blood, maybe they can overlook it no multiplayer, the game gets thrown out the window - Some of you couldn't care less about the kids, but obviously EA does. I'd say, this is the kind of thing for an add-on, by then SOF2 will be out, and the developer will have an example to draw upon. Anyway, thats how I feel about this whole thing, but I'm sure some of you would rather they just kick the kids in the ass, and take out Multiplayer. I think I'll just wait for the add-on. ------------------ El Presidente says "The future is near and will be ours!"