|
12-19-2002, 04:57 AM
I find it hard to believe ANYONE would think mgs2 is the better game, graphically mgs2 looks like crap compared to it and in terms of gameplay splintercell is much more realistic.
In mgs2 you have the dumbest enemy ai ive ever seen. It relys on a "view cone" to spot you and you conviently have the option of a radar system to tell when you're outta their field of view. You can stand roughly 10 feet away from an enemy staring straight at you and he won't spot you. oOo:
MGs2 was no more than an action game with the usual "take 30 ak rounds to die", in splintercell its not as forgiving and you can only take a few hits which makes the game a lot harder. Pistols take a few hits to kill you wheras an ak can kil you in much fewer hits.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nyck
But one of her fucking grandkids, pookie, rayray or lil-nub was probably slanging weed or rocks out of the house.
|
|