View Single Post
Old
  (#14)
Bazooka_Joe is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 12,585
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Staten Island, NY, USA
 Send a message via ICQ to Bazooka_Joe Send a message via AIM to Bazooka_Joe Send a message via MSN to Bazooka_Joe Send a message via Yahoo to Bazooka_Joe  
Default 01-30-2003, 07:54 PM

[img]http://www17.tomshardware.com/graphic/20030127/images/fx-card2.jpg[/img]

[img]http://www17.tomshardware.com/graphic/20030127/images/fx-card1.jpg[/img]

[img]http://www17.tomshardware.com/graphic/20030127/images/fx-card3.jpg[/img]

Here's the hardware specs compared to a GF4 and a RADEON 9700:

http://www17.tomshardware.com/graphic/2 ... fx-03.html


This was from Tom's Hardware Guide, his conclusion on the card:

[quote:d89a0]NVIDIA takes the crown! No question about it - the GeForceFX 5800 Ultra is faster than the competition from ATI's Radeon 9700 PRO in the majority of the benchmarks. However, its lead is only slight, especially compared to the distance that ATI put between its Radeon 9700 PRO and the Ti 4600. Still, when compared to its predecessor, the GeForce4 Ti, the FX represents a giant step forward. [/quote:d89a0]
  
Reply With Quote