View Single Post
Old
  (#19)
1080jibber is Offline
1st Lieutenant
 
1080jibber's Avatar
 
Posts: 4,435
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: American't
 Send a message via ICQ to 1080jibber  
Default 01-31-2003, 01:26 AM

[quote="Bazooka_Joe":ef184][img]http://www17.tomshardware.com/graphic/20030127/images/fx-card2.jpg[/img]

[img]http://www17.tomshardware.com/graphic/20030127/images/fx-card1.jpg[/img]

[img]http://www17.tomshardware.com/graphic/20030127/images/fx-card3.jpg[/img]

Here's the hardware specs compared to a GF4 and a RADEON 9700:

[url="http://www17.tomshardware.com/graphic/20030127/geforce_fx-03.html"]http://www17.tomshardware.com/graphic/2 ... fx-03.html[/url]



This was from Tom's Hardware Guide, his conclusion on the card:

[quote:ef184]NVIDIA takes the crown! No question about it - the GeForceFX 5800 Ultra is faster than the competition from ATI's Radeon 9700 PRO in the majority of the benchmarks. However, its lead is only slight, especially compared to the distance that ATI put between its Radeon 9700 PRO and the Ti 4600. Still, when compared to its predecessor, the GeForce4 Ti, the FX represents a giant step forward. [/quote:ef184][/quote:ef184]


that thing is a joke!
  
Reply With Quote