Thread: Best gun ever.
View Single Post
Old
  (#37)
Gen. Disarray is Offline
Junior Member
 
Posts: 19
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: H.B. California
   
Default 02-19-2003, 01:19 AM

oOo: OMFG....JUST WHAT THE FUCK??.....WHAT.....YOU KNOW FUCK?? Assuming we are talking about firearms to be utilized by a single person who alone will carry and use said firearm and ammunition without help. (That rules out the obvious ones above cept the trouser trout, which is in a class of its own.)
Thirteen: there is hope for u, I see a genius in the making.
OMFG WHOEVER IS THE RETARD WHO SAID MG42 (CREW SERVED? NOT EXCATLY A STAND ALONE COMBAT WEAPON? UH LESSEE....HMMMM...PRETTY DURNED GOOD FOR WW2 BUT BEST..?? IF YOU DONT RESTRICT CRITERIA, NOT AND IDIOTIC ANSWER, SPECIALLY COMPARED TO A ****MOTHERFUCKING LUGER******???? A LUGER IS, AS A MATTER OF SCIENTIFIC FACT, A COLOSSAL PIECE OF SHIT THAT I WOULD NOT DEFILE MY TRASHCANS WITH BY THROWING IT IN THEM. THE FACT YOU HAVE THAT OPINION MAKES ME PRAY YOU ARE STERILE SO OUR GENE POOL WONT BE POLLUTED.
As to the best weapon, I agree that the criteria are far too variable and subjective. Best all around military rifle, ever? FAMAS best of its erea? Garand. Best by the standards it set and respect it garnered amoung the finest riflemen in the world (US Marines) Springfield. Best for being idiot proof and evidence that a chimp can kill sloppy AK-47. also the most influential by virtue of being so simple that a pakastani with scrap metal an open hearth and muscle powered machine tools can crank out 5 a week without breaking a sweat.
Finally, wtf is with the bofors, if u wanna include anti aircraft artillery as a gun or firearm....then.....well.....jesus nevermind.
Nukes arent firearms kids, everyone knows their some losers secret science project that is going to be used to get back at the jocks whove been squat humping him in the shower after gym class for 4 years.....oh theyll see and theyll be sorry when he finishes that baby and makes us all pay...
  
Reply With Quote