Alliedassault - View Single Post - Im tired of the wolf fanboys dissing MOH because you dont ru

Manny · 01-08-2002, 03:42 AM

My opinion[s]

Wolfenstein has better graphics: Yes and No. Right now, it looks like it. Wolfenstein has much better textures. Even the models are extremely clear and extremely detailed on almost any card and whoops you off the chair with a Geforce 3. Not so in Medal of Honor. On the other hand, the final will let you compress textures. That might increase the quality.

I recently played Ghost Recon and must say that MoH's AI is great but not...well, very great. They should have scripted the AI a little more. Here and there they are just stupid, not knowing if to shoot or if to take cover, which results in weird back and forth.

I've been to the Achtung Wolfenstein forums, never heard of the movement speed complaint?!?

MoH is not realistic. If you take the Zombies and stuff away from Wolf it's nearly as unrealistic as MoH. But maybe that's why it's a blast to play.

	(#18)
Manny is Offline Senior Member Posts: 609 Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: TheLandOfTheDead	01-08-2002, 03:42 AM My opinion[s] Wolfenstein has better graphics: Yes and No. Right now, it looks like it. Wolfenstein has much better textures. Even the models are extremely clear and extremely detailed on almost any card and whoops you off the chair with a Geforce 3. Not so in Medal of Honor. On the other hand, the final will let you compress textures. That might increase the quality. I recently played Ghost Recon and must say that MoH's AI is great but not...well, very great. They should have scripted the AI a little more. Here and there they are just stupid, not knowing if to shoot or if to take cover, which results in weird back and forth. I've been to the Achtung Wolfenstein forums, never heard of the movement speed complaint?!? MoH is not realistic. If you take the Zombies and stuff away from Wolf it's nearly as unrealistic as MoH. But maybe that's why it's a blast to play.