View Single Post
Old
  (#20)
O71394658 is Offline
Member
 
Posts: 56
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: A theater near you
  Send a message via AIM to O71394658  
Default 06-28-2003, 12:38 AM

[quote="[22nd Elite] Cloud":257f0]Yea i seen this a while ago..and i seen a video i belive it was killer they took boards and shot thru them...there were like 30-40 boards in the ground in a group and shot @ them...and there was nothing but sawdust left..man it was killer....u could take down a whole army with that...but i was thinking...if it shoots in .036 secs.. if i was shot with it..wouldn't i take like 300 bullets with me...and the guy behind me would get less..and so on? if the rate is so high by the time i fall down.....little over .036 secs dunno guessing..i would have tons of ammo in my chest...so i would have absorbed a shit load of bullets.....but they could just go thru me.....dunno....what u guys think?[/quote:257f0]

This is an entirely different approach to firearms. If the bullet actually went through you, and created little to no splintering or force-effect damage, it would probably take several to knock somebody down. But the fact remains, that yes, if the bullets were shot so fast, then people behind you would actually suffer much less damage. A big misconception here is that people think the military is going to carry 1,000,000 rounds into these machine guns. That's POTENTIAL firing rate. They don't count how many rounds in a minute. They do it by seconds and divide it by incremements. So, the gun would in effect only be in operation for milliseconds to seconds. This doesn't seem like it could inflict the maximum possible damage ratios over the greatest possible areas. Its a very interesting concept, but I don't think its readily militarily applicable.
  
Reply With Quote