Alliedassault - View Single Post

Recycled Spooge · 07-20-2001, 10:42 AM

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by riesep:
BTW how was Jurassic Park 3.How was it compared to the other 2.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE> It was an action packed thrill ride.

No love triangles, or annoying boring parts with Ben Affleck. But why, why make the movie so short?? It was only about 1:40. The dinosaurs like the Spinosaurus or the almighty Tyrannosaurs didn't have enough air time. The movie was pretty predictable, but there was a lot of interesting (funny) scenes and plot twists. The ending was kind of cheap. Maybe in the next movie they'll make a survivor series on Isla Sorna. But even though the story was predictable, it was still fun to watch.

------------------

	(#11)
Recycled Spooge is Offline Senior Member Posts: 4,430 Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Hitler's Magic Barn	07-20-2001, 10:42 AM <BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by riesep: BTW how was Jurassic Park 3.How was it compared to the other 2.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE> It was an action packed thrill ride. No love triangles, or annoying boring parts with Ben Affleck. But why, why make the movie so short?? It was only about 1:40. The dinosaurs like the Spinosaurus or the almighty Tyrannosaurs didn't have enough air time. The movie was pretty predictable, but there was a lot of interesting (funny) scenes and plot twists. The ending was kind of cheap. Maybe in the next movie they'll make a survivor series on Isla Sorna. But even though the story was predictable, it was still fun to watch. ------------------