Sheesh...how about we throw helmets on Omaha...no weapons at all...
I think it is fine the way it is. I agree that it is stupid for the allies or axis either one to have too many snipers, but if either one does, the objectives cannot be met. Snipers die in the bunkers. Period. On both sides. I have hardly seen allied snipers up on top. Why? because when they get into the bunker they face plenty of SMG's, MP-40's, and shottys(and grenades
). The sniper rifle is mainly for bu of the main attack and keeping your machine gunners and shotties safe into the bunker. If too many are using it then the objective won't be won. You may rack up a bunch of kills, but the team will not win. And the idea of the objective maps is teamplay and winning the team objective. I have been on the winning axis side plenty of times...I have played on servers where the axis team was able to give plenty of hell to the allied team. If they blew the guns...they earned it. And I never heard one complaint about snipers. Maybe if people would learn how to play the game and maps, then we would see less posts like this...
------------------
~Mange~
