Alliedassault - View Single Post

Reefer · **Re: breakthrough sucks -** 10-07-2003, 03:41 PM

[quote="WombleDieH@rd":a8497]ok i bought it im ashamed of myself breakthrough is a bad add on slightly better than spearhead on the single player side but for the multiplayer its bad actually its shit.
ea games need to go back to making dogy fifa games and leave it to activision who seem to be doing well with the concept of call of duty.
i wont be playing breakthrough on multiplayer and i feel ea games owe me 16 pounds for this shite its an injustice to my wallett.
im tempted to call my lawyer and the consumers act for a game trying to impersonate a good shoot em up war game.
anyone heard the expression someone trying to flog a dead horse well ea games have just done it and its cost us stupid junkie moh players some dosh.
now if anyone from ea games read this post just to say kiss my arse suckers and next time you release such poor shite give it away as a patch for free and not to charge but then again when call of duty comes out people will be saying breakthrough who?????????????????? the_finger:[/quote:a8497]

Talking of flogging a dead horse... CoD seems to fit that description perfectly. The original MoH:AA devs knock out basically the same game under a new title and with a few different features (Iron Sights and the ability to go prone seem to be the only differences I noticed in the demo), and everyone seems to think it's going to be sooo much better (maybe it will, maybe it won't). Well... basically, we're going to have 3 different camps now instead of 2... RTCW, MoH and now CoD... same shit... different smell! Once the excitment of running through a new SP game wears off, you're left with exactly the same game to play in MP. I'm starting to feel some Deja-Vu... CS vs RS, Mac vs PC, and now CoD vs MoH! stupid:

	(#38)
Reefer is Offline Junior Member Posts: 4 Join Date: Oct 2003	Re: breakthrough sucks - 10-07-2003, 03:41 PM [quote="WombleDieH@rd":a8497]ok i bought it im ashamed of myself breakthrough is a bad add on slightly better than spearhead on the single player side but for the multiplayer its bad actually its shit. ea games need to go back to making dogy fifa games and leave it to activision who seem to be doing well with the concept of call of duty. i wont be playing breakthrough on multiplayer and i feel ea games owe me 16 pounds for this shite its an injustice to my wallett. im tempted to call my lawyer and the consumers act for a game trying to impersonate a good shoot em up war game. anyone heard the expression someone trying to flog a dead horse well ea games have just done it and its cost us stupid junkie moh players some dosh. now if anyone from ea games read this post just to say kiss my arse suckers and next time you release such poor shite give it away as a patch for free and not to charge but then again when call of duty comes out people will be saying breakthrough who?????????????????? the_finger:[/quote:a8497] Talking of flogging a dead horse... CoD seems to fit that description perfectly. The original MoH:AA devs knock out basically the same game under a new title and with a few different features (Iron Sights and the ability to go prone seem to be the only differences I noticed in the demo), and everyone seems to think it's going to be sooo much better (maybe it will, maybe it won't). Well... basically, we're going to have 3 different camps now instead of 2... RTCW, MoH and now CoD... same shit... different smell! Once the excitment of running through a new SP game wears off, you're left with exactly the same game to play in MP. I'm starting to feel some Deja-Vu... CS vs RS, Mac vs PC, and now CoD vs MoH! stupid: