Thread: CoD letdown?
View Single Post
Old
  (#67)
geRV is Offline
General of the Army
 
Posts: 18,202
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Ireland
   
Default 11-03-2003, 12:53 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by guarnere
i still think its bullocks, no matter what....i look for quality in a game...and if moh had added a few more things in, would still be on top....cod's models are horrible, low poly crap....the skins are not impressive, since they took every skin from actual 'items'....they look watery and blurry....but whatever you can play it all you want...if you like fast pace, unrealistic, dung, this is your bag...im not gonna waste my money on this peice of shit
Ive already posted about the models 3 or 4 times.

[quote:98d16]Models are "sub par" for a reason, theres a shitload of them on screen at once and obviously not everyone has like 3ghz and a radeon 9800 to run it at a decent framerate. Id hardly call them "sub par" anyway, theyre not the most detailed in the world bt they do their job well.

This is the only recent release i can think off where everyones more or less been able to play it without any real framerate bitching.
[/quote:98d16]


[img]http://homepage.ntlworld.com/gerald.marley/Other%20pics/shot0011.jpg[/img]

Thats everything on full settings, with 6x fsaa and anisotropic filtering. Look at the amount of character models hauling ass. If they were as detailed as say pacific assault you would have maybe a dozen of them at most before framerate divebombed. The atmosphere in this game blows away any other game ive played ebacuse of the sheer amount of characters running about.




Quote:
Originally Posted by Nyck
But one of her fucking grandkids, pookie, rayray or lil-nub was probably slanging weed or rocks out of the house.
  
Reply With Quote