Alliedassault - View Single Post

bwolf · 11-20-2003, 03:08 PM

[quote="{TRC}ZenMaster":098cf]Actually ,

There is enormous proof that the historical timeline of the bible is accurate.

There are sighns of Noahs flood still present today. There have been several Archeological discoveries that show that not only the cities of the bible existed but are located where the bibles says they were.

The biggest problem is , the bible was written in a language that no longer exists. And has been translated to several different languages since. So in my oppion the words one would read from it , cannot be taken as EXACTLY what happened. The translation would just mess it all up. Sort of like telling a story to your friend , he then tells the story to others , them to others and so on. By the time the story got back to you it would be different.

As far as Jesus goes.......I think he was a man of profound wisdom and knowledge. I do believe that his touch alone could heal. However I do not believe he was a son of a god. Think about it.....How would you describe a man like that during that time frame? What words would you use to explain him in the time of the Roman Empire?

I do not follow Christ related religions because of the church. I believe the Vatican holds more secrets than the American Government! lol.

Gonna stop there for now , alot to take in and talk about......[/quote:098cf]
I think that, whoever it was that said something about the Bible, may have wanted to mean that the Bible is not entirely fictitious.... like the movie Titanic, the stoy line is ridiculous but its foundation lies on actual events and even a few real people. Most great novels take place in actual cities and involve actual historical events. So the flood may have happened, but did Noah make an arc? And based on the dimensions of it, and the number of species there are now, something does not add up: Either evolution (which is against most Christians’ beliefs) created a lot of extra species since then; the flood didn’t really cover the world, but only a relatively small part of it - which i have seen a lot of research on, and seems to be most likely; or those animals were packed very, very tightly. Anyway, I imagine Jesus was the man, but I'm with you on the church... conspirators.

	(#72)
bwolf is Offline Senior Member Posts: 467 Join Date: Oct 2003	11-20-2003, 03:08 PM [quote="{TRC}ZenMaster":098cf]Actually , There is enormous proof that the historical timeline of the bible is accurate. There are sighns of Noahs flood still present today. There have been several Archeological discoveries that show that not only the cities of the bible existed but are located where the bibles says they were. The biggest problem is , the bible was written in a language that no longer exists. And has been translated to several different languages since. So in my oppion the words one would read from it , cannot be taken as EXACTLY what happened. The translation would just mess it all up. Sort of like telling a story to your friend , he then tells the story to others , them to others and so on. By the time the story got back to you it would be different. As far as Jesus goes.......I think he was a man of profound wisdom and knowledge. I do believe that his touch alone could heal. However I do not believe he was a son of a god. Think about it.....How would you describe a man like that during that time frame? What words would you use to explain him in the time of the Roman Empire? I do not follow Christ related religions because of the church. I believe the Vatican holds more secrets than the American Government! lol. Gonna stop there for now , alot to take in and talk about......[/quote:098cf] I think that, whoever it was that said something about the Bible, may have wanted to mean that the Bible is not entirely fictitious.... like the movie Titanic, the stoy line is ridiculous but its foundation lies on actual events and even a few real people. Most great novels take place in actual cities and involve actual historical events. So the flood may have happened, but did Noah make an arc? And based on the dimensions of it, and the number of species there are now, something does not add up: Either evolution (which is against most Christians’ beliefs) created a lot of extra species since then; the flood didn’t really cover the world, but only a relatively small part of it - which i have seen a lot of research on, and seems to be most likely; or those animals were packed very, very tightly. Anyway, I imagine Jesus was the man, but I'm with you on the church... conspirators.