Alliedassault - View Single Post

acgreen · 01-31-2002, 02:14 AM

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Tahoma, Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by fatbastard21:
-----CUT-----
someone on an earlier post said to change the res to 1280 by 768 and it will increase fps. I'm thinking this guy is out of his mind, so I didn't bother with it until tonight. my fps are now much more consistent.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

I was the guy that said it was better. For me, personally, and on my system, 1280x1024x32 actually ran faster, smoother, and of course looked better, than 640x480x32, 800x600x32, 1024x768x32, etc..... I don't know how it would be on other people's systems, but it sure looks a hell of a lot better on mine.

------------------
Huked un foniks wurkde for me!

------------------
If "con" is the opposite of "pro," then what is the opposite of progress?

	(#4)
acgreen is Offline Senior Member Posts: 244 Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Northern California	01-31-2002, 02:14 AM <BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Tahoma, Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by fatbastard21: -----CUT----- someone on an earlier post said to change the res to 1280 by 768 and it will increase fps. I'm thinking this guy is out of his mind, so I didn't bother with it until tonight. my fps are now much more consistent.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE> I was the guy that said it was better. For me, personally, and on my system, 1280x1024x32 actually ran faster, smoother, and of course looked better, than 640x480x32, 800x600x32, 1024x768x32, etc..... I don't know how it would be on other people's systems, but it sure looks a hell of a lot better on mine. ------------------ Huked un foniks wurkde for me! ------------------ If "con" is the opposite of "pro," then what is the opposite of progress?