View Single Post
Old
  (#116)
1080jibber is Offline
1st Lieutenant
 
1080jibber's Avatar
 
Posts: 4,435
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: American't
 Send a message via ICQ to 1080jibber  
Default 12-14-2003, 05:12 PM

[quote="General Cobra":e0be5][quote="Animal Mother":e0be5]AY


Quote:
Originally Posted by Innoxx
Against the UN accords. There's over 200 countries in the world and a lot of them have the same sutuation. Look how disloyal the Iraqi army was. If the Iraqi people took up arms they could've easily taken Saddam. They didn't because Saddam did provide them something VERY important, ECONOMIC STABILITY.

If you go on the streets of Baghdad right now and ask if they prefered Saddam to the current situation, maybe 90% would prefer Saddam.

What's the point of the picture of the dead child and it's mother? The US bombed Iraq on a weekly basis since '91 up until this war. How many children died then? I've also read on how 9 children and one dult died in Afghanistan last week when an American fighter plane dropped a bomb on a group of school children because they thought they were Al Quaeda.

You'll never read about that shit in American media.
[/quote:e0be5]

Its in the American media all the time. The fact that people say it isnt just shows they dont watch the news. The only dif is we aren't the BBC so we cant show an iraqi shaking adead baby by it's leg at the camera.

When i was in the hospital I watched cnn everyday during the war and I saw a ton of reports of the USA mistakingly bombing places they shouldnt have. America fucks up a lot no question. But no other country has the BALLS to dislodge a communist from killing his own people. They just sit back and watch. FRANCE GERMANY CANADA go ahead and sit back and spit. But we have the honor to still fight for you if you ever needed it. Something you will never understand.[/quote:e0be5]


why did you just say Canada just sits back, Canada played by the rules, and if the U.S. did the same, then Canada would be there in Iraq with them
  
Reply With Quote