Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Madmartagen
Earmes, dont turn this into a fucking liberal vs. conservative issue again. You always do that shit and its really fucking annoying. All you do is blame democrats, liberals, and people who don't think the same way Bush tells them too. It isnt liberals and hippies who divide this country, its ignorant jerkoffs like you who point the finger at everyone who doesnt want to play ball with Bush. It is so ridiculous to blame everything on the previous administration, ok? No one blamed Bush Sr. when the WTC was attacked the first time, and Clinton got the heat for it even though he was in office for only 48 days. Bush Jr. used Clintons military to defeat the Taliban in Afghanistan. How do I know that? Because Bush spent his first year taking a nap and going on vacation. He also didnt create a military budget until October of 2002, a whole year after the Afghanistan campaign. Ergo, if the military was underfunded or suffered from budget cuts, it would not have been able to perform so brilliantly in Afghanistan. I'm a liberal, I'm glad Saddam is in jail, and I give Bush credit for sending our men in to get the job done whether there are WMD's or not. So for God's sake just enjoy the moment that is today, before everyone goes back to their party-biased bullshit.
|
How am I turning it into a liberal vs conservative argument? All I did was answer questions...and obviously you seem to have problems with people that disagree with you by calling me "ingnorant" even though I dont personally attack anyone on these forums (because i think only pussies insult other people over the internet because they don't have to back up their statements they can just throw them out there and not have to worry about getting their asses kicked for making them) But clearly everyone who disagrees with what i have to say, but can't come up with a legitamate argument with me instead has to resort to personal attacks on me like calling me "ignorant" or a "racist" because they don't have anything else to argue. As for you comments on the militares budget,/size/effectivness...its a well known fact that clinton initiated one of the largest military cutbacks in american history, its also a well known fact that clinton did not like the military, he distrusted it and thought of it as uncessary, this why almost all military actions that happend during the clinton era were fiascos like somalia and his response to our embasy bombings, but still don't get the wrong impression...he could have cut the military budget and the size of our military in half and we still are able to roll through any one country on earth with no problem like you pointed out, in afganistan...but fighting mutliple wars on multiple fronts...thats a diferent story...our military curently isnt capable of doing that...why? clinton era cutbacks its a fact, its not party bias. Now to address your statement about the first WTC bombing, george bush senior didn't have any intel on that attack happening at all, and as i recall no one blamed bush sr or clinton for that attack...it was just a horrible act of terrorism....an no one would be blaming clinton for 9-11 if it wasn't a known fact that clinton could have captured or killed bin ladin on a few occasions and decided not to, even though he bombed 2 us embassies and blew a hole in one of ships, clinton did nothing but launch a few cruise missles and call it a day....and again thats not party bias its facts, strait and simple, you just dont like to hear the truth...and automaticly asume im just spewing party rhetoric. As for your final statements, I think its great that you support bush and the war on terror, my prior posts weren't aimed at you, they were aimed at the foreigners and their anti-american rhetoric and the gloom and doom liberals state side.