Alliedassault - View Single Post

Shoegaze99 · 02-06-2002, 01:28 AM

Collin, spouting off inaccuracies does little to advance your argument, even if you do so IN ALL CAPS.

If EA wanted the game to be as realistic as possible, it would have been a realism-orientated game. It's not. It's an action-orientated shooter.

If EA wanted the game to be as realistic as possible, shooting soldiers to death would not cause magic health packs to appear from their dead bodies. And mounted machine guns would not have limited ammo. And so on. And so on.

You're argument against certain weapons on Omaha is a poor one. If you want to argue against Weapon X on Level B, by all means do so ... but try to stick to the same reality everybody else shares, eh?

	(#23)
Shoegaze99 is Offline Senior Member Posts: 149 Join Date: Jan 2002	02-06-2002, 01:28 AM Collin, spouting off inaccuracies does little to advance your argument, even if you do so IN ALL CAPS. If EA wanted the game to be as realistic as possible, it would have been a realism-orientated game. It's not. It's an action-orientated shooter. If EA wanted the game to be as realistic as possible, shooting soldiers to death would not cause magic health packs to appear from their dead bodies. And mounted machine guns would not have limited ammo. And so on. And so on. You're argument against certain weapons on Omaha is a poor one. If you want to argue against Weapon X on Level B, by all means do so ... but try to stick to the same reality everybody else shares, eh?