Alliedassault - View Single Post

imported_Fluffy_Bunny · 03-14-2004, 02:30 PM

If they can use that loophole then so be it, but they better be damn sure that the targets were not threats to the allied invasion. The whole point of warfare is to kill the enemy, if they were uncertain that it was the enemy then fair enough. To refuse orders because they didn't agree with the war is mutiny & in my service people who do that can still end up on a piece of rope hanging from the yardarm. hake:

If it was the enemy and they didn't destroy the targets then the enemy could have gone on to kill our troops.

	(#3)
imported_Fluffy_Bunny is Offline Senior Member Posts: 3,564 Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Reading 'Country Life' magazine in a crack wh0res brothel in Soho, London	03-14-2004, 02:30 PM If they can use that loophole then so be it, but they better be damn sure that the targets were not threats to the allied invasion. The whole point of warfare is to kill the enemy, if they were uncertain that it was the enemy then fair enough. To refuse orders because they didn't agree with the war is mutiny & in my service people who do that can still end up on a piece of rope hanging from the yardarm. hake: If it was the enemy and they didn't destroy the targets then the enemy could have gone on to kill our troops.