View Single Post
Old
  (#37)
Short Hand is Offline
Brigadier General
 
Posts: 10,721
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: C-eH-N-eH-D-eH eH?
   
Default 03-24-2004, 07:57 PM

[quote:7f3fc]4th I will enable myself to protect myself and family from thugs [/quote:7f3fc]

Your more likely to kill a family member then a so called thug. Its a fact.


[quote:7f3fc]5th you said the "American" gun companies were importing guns into Canada- well that is just non sense. Criminals are importing the guns and they are from manufactures all over the world, not just the US [/quote:7f3fc]

Most of these street weapon showing up in Toronto are American made. Almost all of them buddy.

[quote:7f3fc]2nd I doubt if it ever came to it and we crazy Americans decided it was time to overthrow our govt that the soldiers (who are our sons,daughters brothers and sisters) would fire upon American people [/quote:7f3fc]

Exactly what I was trying to say. The idea is obserd. Why is that right put on your fucking constitution. ? Law wasn't as organized back then and out in the west or out on your farm you needed a gun to survive. They had no idea that weapons of such destruction such as a, automatic weapon firing 9mm death would come about. (Tech 9) It was made in a different time for different situations. Times have changed so have guns. They are more lethal and not a neccasry thing for your average city slicker family. Recreational use for hunting is fine but why should hunting we a potenial weapon to kill someone or being able to buy an m-16 or Tech 9 be a right ? Why the fuck do you need that kind of right ? Amend your constitution and get this over with. You don't need the weapon and if you want to show it off then make sure it can't fire. If you really need to unleash an automatic weapon the join the Army, they have lots !. Almost all 1st World Nation have already seen the obvious flaw in letting citizens have automatic weapons and have taken this insane so called right away.

[quote:7f3fc]3rd Lawful guns are used for just that, lawful purposes[/quote:7f3fc]

-The guns bought for columbine were lawful.

-Andrew golden and his Friend used lawful guns to use fellow students as target practice after they pulled the fire alarm.

The fact is these events most likely either wouldn't have happned or would not have been as severe as they wre if such weapon were banned.

[quote:7f3fc]6th It is sad that that kind of violence happened at your school
[/quote:7f3fc]
Ya it is sad. But if you had strickter gu laws in America then it would never have happned. ome kid would never have almost ave been killed. Which he could have. Life takes priority over a falty right.


-Then their is the arguement that the black market will get those guns into the US and their is no hope in fighting them because no matter what they will win..... LOet look at Canada until recently Automatic weapon working and ready to kill with Amunition were next to impossible to find. The weapons that were around for gangs to use were baseball batts machettes, No gang shootings gang fatalities were almost non existent etc. The fact is they had no guns.


This is logic not some exteme left view. The fact is most gun toting People don't want to give their guns up just because they are theirs. They go fanatical and turn it into the issue as if your trying to take a real right from them. A gun isn't a right, Its a Priveledge. Automatic weapons aren't needed at all.

Gun maniacs flare away.
  
Reply With Quote