Alliedassault - View Single Post

Shoegaze99 · 02-11-2002, 08:34 AM

Let's see, BMillis, what we can say here:

"It doesn't have singleplayer..."

Okay, fine. Deal with it from a multiplayer point of view. Most *know* Day of Defeat is a multipplayer game

"It is a MOD"

And your point is? There are loads of wonderful games that began as mods. One could argue easily enough that games using another game's engine are little more than total conversions. Why is Day of Defeat's MOD status a bad thing? And will that change when it is on store shelves as a commercial product (as it will be)?

"DOD graphics are a lot worse than MOHAA graphics"

Really and truly, YAWN. I like great graphics, I pay attention to great graphics, but in the end graphics mean exactly _squat_ compared to great gameplay. I'd rather play a game that plays well and is entertaining than a game that looks stunning but lacks substance any day. None of this, mind you, means Medal of Honor is a good-looking game without subtance ... for you folks ready to jump, I am talking in the general, not about MoH.

"The water is realistic, not solid green"

Yeah, nice, but that's the same as your last point. It's a graphics issue. And graphics do not mean a damn thing in the face of a good game.

"You want more????"

Yes. But not more question marks, because they are a sign of near illiteracy.

	(#11)
Shoegaze99 is Offline Senior Member Posts: 149 Join Date: Jan 2002	02-11-2002, 08:34 AM Let's see, BMillis, what we can say here: "It doesn't have singleplayer..." Okay, fine. Deal with it from a multiplayer point of view. Most know Day of Defeat is a multipplayer game "It is a MOD" And your point is? There are loads of wonderful games that began as mods. One could argue easily enough that games using another game's engine are little more than total conversions. Why is Day of Defeat's MOD status a bad thing? And will that change when it is on store shelves as a commercial product (as it will be)? "DOD graphics are a lot worse than MOHAA graphics" Really and truly, YAWN. I like great graphics, I pay attention to great graphics, but in the end graphics mean exactly _squat_ compared to great gameplay. I'd rather play a game that plays well and is entertaining than a game that looks stunning but lacks substance any day. None of this, mind you, means Medal of Honor is a good-looking game without subtance ... for you folks ready to jump, I am talking in the general, not about MoH. "The water is realistic, not solid green" Yeah, nice, but that's the same as your last point. It's a graphics issue. And graphics do not mean a damn thing in the face of a good game. "You want more????" Yes. But not more question marks, because they are a sign of near illiteracy.