Alliedassault - View Single Post - Moore's new 9/11 film to open on June 25th

Chappy · 06-04-2004, 02:15 PM

[quote="Short Hand":67ac9]

-The man who wrote that article, John Fund" is a right extremist. (More fanatical then a Tree Hugger")

-He is a Wife Beater. If you didn't know about that little incident

-This guy is rumored to have multiple affairs. From what I see he is another Right "sided" scum bag.(Not that the left does not have any as well) If you take what he wrote in that article seriously then seriously you are just feeding into his bullshit.

-Never take a 3rd rate columnist's internet postings as anything but biased crap.

[/quote:67ac9]

you didnt deal with the facts in Fund's article but resorted to name calling: right extremist, wife beater, philanderer, right "sided" scum bag, and finally a 3rd rate columnist...absolutely nothing about the facts he presents about Moore's style of filmaking that overlooks facts in order to make his point.

the debate was over when you started the ole mud sling because you resorted to what you so detest: ignoring the issues and start with the name calling...followed by me being clueless because i disagree with you. i respect your opinion but dont feel the need to go to personal attacks to circumvent the point

i still stand by Fund's article in spite of all his inadequecies as a man (Clinton was a man-whore but that didnt seem to sway Democrats and liberals in general to question his judgment)

	(#42)
Chappy is Offline Senior Member Posts: 195 Join Date: Nov 2003	06-04-2004, 02:15 PM [quote="Short Hand":67ac9] -The man who wrote that article, John Fund" is a right extremist. (More fanatical then a Tree Hugger") -He is a Wife Beater. If you didn't know about that little incident -This guy is rumored to have multiple affairs. From what I see he is another Right "sided" scum bag.(Not that the left does not have any as well) If you take what he wrote in that article seriously then seriously you are just feeding into his bullshit. -Never take a 3rd rate columnist's internet postings as anything but biased crap. [/quote:67ac9] you didnt deal with the facts in Fund's article but resorted to name calling: right extremist, wife beater, philanderer, right "sided" scum bag, and finally a 3rd rate columnist...absolutely nothing about the facts he presents about Moore's style of filmaking that overlooks facts in order to make his point. the debate was over when you started the ole mud sling because you resorted to what you so detest: ignoring the issues and start with the name calling...followed by me being clueless because i disagree with you. i respect your opinion but dont feel the need to go to personal attacks to circumvent the point i still stand by Fund's article in spite of all his inadequecies as a man (Clinton was a man-whore but that didnt seem to sway Democrats and liberals in general to question his judgment)