Alliedassault - View Single Post

TGB! · 07-02-2004, 11:06 AM

[quote:6f1d1]wrong again. The company at the time (i have no idea of the current company unless it changed etc.) was database Technologies[/quote:6f1d1]

Which is ChoicePoint. Thank you for playing.

[quote:6f1d1]Trust me those 1500" voters would have put Gore into office.[/quote:6f1d1]

Again you are assuming you know what they would have done. Why don’t we just bypass elections all together and just go with the Gallup Poll.

[quote:6f1d1] Gore didn't argue any of this and neither did the democratic party itself, it seems they just accepted it. WHich baffels me.[/quote:6f1d1]

Because he felt there was no merit to it?

[quote:6f1d1] and 2 Senators from Hawaii. (Hawain) 2 of these minorities Senators are backbenchers (as we call them in Canada) and 1 is fairly prominent. NOw if you think that 2 senators that are hawain are going to risk their career for a black person from congress, then you got naother thing coming, they might as well be white just like ALL of the other members in the Senate. As for Boxer, that ain't black. SO minorities support in the senate does not seem like its their as you claim, which amazes why you would not look over the ones who are there. If only support had been their, if someone had the balls to maybe even question the disfranchisement. better safe then sorry.[/quote:6f1d1]

What the fuck? Who brought up Barbara Boxer? Are you pulling shit out of your ass? Yes you are, I mean you dont even know that that ChoicePoint is the new name of the company (or for that matter their original name) so why should I expect you to come up with any real facts Shorty. Lets say there WERENT any minorities in the Senate: where are the female Senators to support the poor blakcs? Where were Bob Graham and Bill Nelson? The Senate is not dominated by Republicans – so where were the democrats? “Oh they were just protecting their jobs” – you mean. . .being political? Yea. . .funny how that works out huh.

[quote:6f1d1] put your money where your mouth is and prove her wrong, email her ask her yourself.[/quote:6f1d1]

I don’t need to prove her wrong. She needs to prove herself right, and she was unable to do so. Of course because it was a conspiracy against her that’s why. Of course someone just KNEW Florida would be the battleground state so they went in there and started creating all kinds of trouble.

[quote:6f1d1] the ones on those planes were, not "all" Saudis. your planting racism here because you have no real arguement to really debate, why they just let these guyz go. Or would it have been to racist to have held them in custody and question them about a few things ? again go tell that to the 911 victims and their family's. Im sure they would love to hear you.[/quote:6f1d1]

When all else fails go with sentimentality. I would look each and everyone of those families in the face and tell them “I’m sorry for your loss, but you’re not going to scapegoat people because you want revenge or peace of mind”. That’s not justice. The 142 people allowed to leave were mostly Saudis. Not “mostly” meaning half, mostly meaning MOST of them. Maybe 10-20 werent.

Again, you purposely overlook the FACTS presented to you:

The FBI determined that noone needed to be interviewed. This is the FBI. These are the people who have been tailing the Bin Ladens activities stateside for years. THEY determined they did not need to be held or questioned. What do YOU know that the FBI doesn’t.

The 9/11 commmission THEMSELVES said that the flights were not suspicious nor concealed, nor was their exit out of the country contrary to procedure. Again, what do YOU know that they don’t. Want links can you provide right fucking now that says “Hey heres what they should have done”. Besides referring to a film that wears its bias on its sleeve, what research have you done SPECIFICALLY that runs counter to OFFICIAL findings and reports?

[quote:6f1d1] Hell they even fund millions of dollers into AL Queda, yet you don't seem to be wanting to invade SA. ?[/quote:6f1d1]

Again – give us your evidence. Give us your links. Give us hard numbers that arent bullshit lines taken from movies or “democrat.org”.

[quote:6f1d1] Then if what he is saying is true??? why are you argueing it ? seems you just shut yourself down.[/quote:6f1d1]

Deductive analysis is not your strong point. But you’re right – Moore’s PERSONALLY HIRED, PERSONALLY FUNDED NON INDEPENDENT fact check team is above reproach. Definitely. Uh huh.

As for your recounting the “Mean streets of Canada” – gimme a fucking break. That’s just to hilarious to even bother commenting on.

The rest of the shit I left out because its nothing supported by facts, just sentimentality and meaningless rhetoric. Until you can bring up some FACTS to back these claims. . .we really don’t have much to talk about.

	(#50)
TGB! is Offline Command Sergeant Major Posts: 2,644 Join Date: Dec 2003	07-02-2004, 11:06 AM [quote:6f1d1]wrong again. The company at the time (i have no idea of the current company unless it changed etc.) was database Technologies[/quote:6f1d1] Which is ChoicePoint. Thank you for playing. [quote:6f1d1]Trust me those 1500" voters would have put Gore into office.[/quote:6f1d1] Again you are assuming you know what they would have done. Why don’t we just bypass elections all together and just go with the Gallup Poll. [quote:6f1d1] Gore didn't argue any of this and neither did the democratic party itself, it seems they just accepted it. WHich baffels me.[/quote:6f1d1] Because he felt there was no merit to it? [quote:6f1d1] and 2 Senators from Hawaii. (Hawain) 2 of these minorities Senators are backbenchers (as we call them in Canada) and 1 is fairly prominent. NOw if you think that 2 senators that are hawain are going to risk their career for a black person from congress, then you got naother thing coming, they might as well be white just like ALL of the other members in the Senate. As for Boxer, that ain't black. SO minorities support in the senate does not seem like its their as you claim, which amazes why you would not look over the ones who are there. If only support had been their, if someone had the balls to maybe even question the disfranchisement. better safe then sorry.[/quote:6f1d1] What the fuck? Who brought up Barbara Boxer? Are you pulling shit out of your ass? Yes you are, I mean you dont even know that that ChoicePoint is the new name of the company (or for that matter their original name) so why should I expect you to come up with any real facts Shorty. Lets say there WERENT any minorities in the Senate: where are the female Senators to support the poor blakcs? Where were Bob Graham and Bill Nelson? The Senate is not dominated by Republicans – so where were the democrats? “Oh they were just protecting their jobs” – you mean. . .being political? Yea. . .funny how that works out huh. [quote:6f1d1] put your money where your mouth is and prove her wrong, email her ask her yourself.[/quote:6f1d1] I don’t need to prove her wrong. She needs to prove herself right, and she was unable to do so. Of course because it was a conspiracy against her that’s why. Of course someone just KNEW Florida would be the battleground state so they went in there and started creating all kinds of trouble. [quote:6f1d1] the ones on those planes were, not "all" Saudis. your planting racism here because you have no real arguement to really debate, why they just let these guyz go. Or would it have been to racist to have held them in custody and question them about a few things ? again go tell that to the 911 victims and their family's. Im sure they would love to hear you.[/quote:6f1d1] When all else fails go with sentimentality. I would look each and everyone of those families in the face and tell them “I’m sorry for your loss, but you’re not going to scapegoat people because you want revenge or peace of mind”. That’s not justice. The 142 people allowed to leave were mostly Saudis. Not “mostly” meaning half, mostly meaning MOST of them. Maybe 10-20 werent. Again, you purposely overlook the FACTS presented to you: The FBI determined that noone needed to be interviewed. This is the FBI. These are the people who have been tailing the Bin Ladens activities stateside for years. THEY determined they did not need to be held or questioned. What do YOU know that the FBI doesn’t. The 9/11 commmission THEMSELVES said that the flights were not suspicious nor concealed, nor was their exit out of the country contrary to procedure. Again, what do YOU know that they don’t. Want links can you provide right fucking now that says “Hey heres what they should have done”. Besides referring to a film that wears its bias on its sleeve, what research have you done SPECIFICALLY that runs counter to OFFICIAL findings and reports? [quote:6f1d1] Hell they even fund millions of dollers into AL Queda, yet you don't seem to be wanting to invade SA. ?[/quote:6f1d1] Again – give us your evidence. Give us your links. Give us hard numbers that arent bullshit lines taken from movies or “democrat.org”. [quote:6f1d1] Then if what he is saying is true??? why are you argueing it ? seems you just shut yourself down.[/quote:6f1d1] Deductive analysis is not your strong point. But you’re right – Moore’s PERSONALLY HIRED, PERSONALLY FUNDED NON INDEPENDENT fact check team is above reproach. Definitely. Uh huh. As for your recounting the “Mean streets of Canada” – gimme a fucking break. That’s just to hilarious to even bother commenting on. The rest of the shit I left out because its nothing supported by facts, just sentimentality and meaningless rhetoric. Until you can bring up some FACTS to back these claims. . .we really don’t have much to talk about.