Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Conscript
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jujumantb
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jotun
i <3 my iPod soooo much, best present i ever got. but i scratched the screen pretty bad today, im so upset...they should make it scratch proof....
anywho, its amazing. iRiver is over-rated. my best friend has one, and its bigger than it looks online. ipod is small and easy to use. i'd highly recommend it. iTunes is a nifty program as well. i use it over winamp now.
|
but for a perfromance user |
nag: |
Yes thats what I said. It wasnt meant as a flame or anything that most people just arent "performance" users. Its just that they arent, nothing wrong with that. The average iPod user simply puts mp3 files on it from iTunes and listens through headphones, perhaps through their car stereo aswell. When I say "performance" user, I mean one that does much more than that with it. The ability to use OGG, ASF, and WMA files with iRiver is important to ME, probly not you guys, thats what I meant by performance user. You guys also probly dont care about iRivers optical line inputs and outputs, again, thats why an iRiver is better for a "performance" user. For most of you iPod users, it probly does everything you would need it to and that is great, you made the right buying decision. For me, what an iPod does is not enough, thats why I choose the iRiver and it was the right buying decision for me. They are two totally different players for different purposes. I hope we can leave it at that and not resort to more childish "flaming" about which is better.