Alliedassault - View Single Post

Short Hand · 08-27-2004, 11:28 PM

Now correct me if im wrong here noc, i dont want to get into a fight about fucking uranium shells.

This article claims it has a 60 % radioActive comparision to its un depleted cousin.

Now this stuff is "harmless when in shells true" What I think is true is that this stuff "becomes dangerous" when it forms into the aerosol form, which happens on impact, this by product of the shot is the dangerous part The stuff that causes radio activity.

I would hope the scientists and all the arthors behind this stuff are not raving fanatical idiots. I don't want to fight about this shit either just trying to clear things up.

	(#43)
Short Hand is Offline Brigadier General Posts: 10,721 Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: C-eH-N-eH-D-eH eH?	08-27-2004, 11:28 PM Now correct me if im wrong here noc, i dont want to get into a fight about fucking uranium shells. This article claims it has a 60 % radioActive comparision to its un depleted cousin. Now this stuff is "harmless when in shells true" What I think is true is that this stuff "becomes dangerous" when it forms into the aerosol form, which happens on impact, this by product of the shot is the dangerous part The stuff that causes radio activity. I would hope the scientists and all the arthors behind this stuff are not raving fanatical idiots. I don't want to fight about this shit either just trying to clear things up.