
06-08-2001, 06:37 AM
"not buying a game because it has no blood or gore is like not buying a music cd because it doesn't have the "explicit lyrics" sticker"
Uh, no. It's more like not buying it because a WWII game, based on Saving Private Ryan, that has absolutely no blood or gore at all is flat out unrealistic, and since I look for realism in my PC games, MOH:AA most likely won't be on my list. Games like SOF2 and Global Operations WILL. Those companys arn't afraid of portraying realistic combat. Obviously, EA and 2015 ARE. Yes, that was a bit harsh, but can you deny it?
"You know...thats the problems with some Americans these days....DJK and others have the time to sit around and critisize 2015 about how the game should be realistic and bloody. But there just saying " I want a game that portrays real war." Thats a bunch a bull. I know that War is bloody and eveyone else does too... but our society can be sick sometimes and say if there is no blood, the game is not going to be fun."
Wow, that was sorta hard to follow. What I got out of it, is you're telling me that I shouldn't have free time to say that there should be blood, and wanting a game that portrays real combat is BS? Also, I'm sick for saying I don't think it'll be fun if it doesn't have blood? That about right?
Wow Japple, good thing you're around to tell me what I can and cannot want in a game.
|