Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Madmartagen
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Merlin122
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Hybrid
Man, that is some fucked up shit. Have you also noticed that the attackers in question have some many different names. CNN calls them insurgents, some people call them militants, terrorists, civiallians. In ww2 the french partisans were call the resistance. I geuss it all depends on what side of the fence you are on. One mans freedom fighter is another mans rebel insurgant. Not that I agree with what happened but I rather see a military targets hit then the senseless execution of female aid workers. Is this a war, is it an occupation? Do we really know what the fuck is going on? It's hard to read past the media slants and propaganda.
|
the difference between the partisans and the insurgents is that the pertisans were fighting against a tyrannical ruler that murder thousands of people for virtually no reason. We went over there for an unknown reason and we certainly havent been committing genocide on the natives. Die while masturbating to forest gump. |
We went in there very heavy handed and bombed alot of shit to bits. The reasons we went in there were half assed from the beggining; fairy tales of WMD, get rid of Saddam and set up a pro western govt. Thats been the play of the game since WW2 ended. There are partisans, terrorists and insurgents all over Iraq, we just cant tell who's who at the moment, or in the video. |
there were civilan casualties on all sides during ww2. saying that we accidently killed a few people during bomb raids, wont justify terrorist war that doesnt fit the rules of the geneva convention.