[-DJK-]

"And if I am offended by them, then they are insults, even if they are truth"

If you are offended, then it means you cannot handle the truth.

"(which they are not, since they are used improperly)."

Yes, you do have a point, but as I said, it's not my fault that "idiot" and thick-headed" are now used incorrectly, to describe someone like you. What I called you was wrong. What I meant was correct.

"I don't have to."

You already are.

"It does take a non-stupid person to type the English language so that others can comprehend it."

Well, alot of what you say doesn't make much sense, so that could be up for debate.

"That is what I am doing, and why I am not stupid."

No, in the actual meaning of the word, you are not stupid. But you've shown much ignorance in this arguement. Does THAT word cover it?

"You are not ALL the members of this board, and cannot vouch for what I have, or have not shown them. Do NOT tell me what others oppinions are when they have not stated them. This is just more evidence to show that you are indeed lying."

I would be INSULTING the members of this board if I said I thought they DIDN'T see your ignorance.

"I agree, and I admit that I was wrong to use the word there."

Good.

"See, I can admit when I'm wrong."

The way you continue to argue proves otherwise. Either you're lying, or you don't KNOW you're wrong, in which case I REALLY pity you.

"You will probably have a harder time considering that this was your driving point in the argument and you have been proclaiming it the "truth", but when you do, we can end this fight."

All I admit was that I used the words "idiot" and "thick-headed" incorrectly according to their exact meanings. But w/the way they are used by just about EVERYONE these days, you WOULD BE those things.

"Why, because I do not believe you blindly when you use words improperly and proclaim them truth? What I AM doing shows I HAVE common sense."

I've not read a single post of yours that hasn't shown a lack common sense.

"When I'm not attacking anyone my own advice serves no purpose."

Well, you've denied things that are clearly true all through out this thread, so I'd say your own advice would serve you well.

"I was wondering if you looked at the terms you called "truth", to see if you were using them properly."

"Absloute incorrectness" was just my little joke(although if it were a word, it would describe you perfectly).

"Can you prove it's the truth?"

I don't HAVE to. Just reading your posts is enough to prove I'm right and you're wrong to anyone w/common sense.

"You didn't even use the words you call "truth" properly."

Oh god. I think it proves that you have no real point, seeing that the only arguement you have left is the fact that I technically used words incorrectly, only because thats the way they're used these days. You're trying to make me look completely wrong about EVERYTHING, simply because of my mis-use of 2 words. That is TRULY pathetic.

"That right there is me asking why you make up these lies you have to defend."

They were not lies. They were me using words that are used incorrectly these days to describe you. I, as everyone, wasn't using them to mean their ACTUAL definition. Neither did you, until you realized that you had NOTHING else, and could only delay your inevitable defeat, by looking up their actual meaning in a vain attempt to make me look bad.

"That is not me attacking you, that is a question."

I saw it as an attack.

"You being right is nothing more then a biased oppininion of yours backed up with words used improperly and no actual proof."

No, my being right is MY BEING RIGHT. And the proof is in YOUR wrong posts.

"Denying what is plainly obvious? You have been insulting me, and proclaiming your insults true when the definitions of the word do not describe me."

The ACTUAL definitions do not, but the attached meaning of those words THESE days describe you perfectly.

"To see if there was a meaning you are using that I am not aware of, which there was not, and is the reason you are WRONG to call me such things."

You were not aware of? HA! You YOURSELF used the word "idiot" in one of your posts. You KNOW exactly what I meant, and since you couldn't deny THAT, you had to look up the actual meaning.

"Which proves that, according to the English language, I am NOT what you are say I am. Which means what you say is not true."

What we BOTH know I MEANT is very true. Looking up those meanings was quite pathetic, and proved, no matter what you respond to this, that you truly were desperate, and had nothing else.

"ROFL, I'm sorry, but are you telling me it's not your fault you used a word incorrectly?"

I used them as everyone else, including YOU used them.

"The meanings you refer to are wrong, made up by people wishing to insult others, making you wrong to call me such things."

Yes, they are, and I technically, as everyone, was wrong. But what I MEANT is absolutely correct.

"Hans is a name, not a definition. Are you making up definitions to insult me now?"

No, I'm jokingly making up definitions to DESCRIBE you. You wouldn't nit-pic like this if you really HAD a good point.



[This message has been edited by -DJK- (edited July 11, 2001).]