[Hans]

"If you are offended, then it means you cannot handle the truth."

Again, me being offended makes it an insult, and I see no evidence that makes it the "truth".

"Yes, you do have a point, but as I said, it's not my fault that "idiot" and thick-headed" are now used incorrectly, to describe someone like you. What I called you was wrong. What I meant was correct."

However, it is your fault you used them incorrectly. I have no idea what you meant, only the meanings of the words you used.

"You already are."

Prove it.

"well, alot of what you say doesn't make much sense, so that could be up for debate."

Like what?

"No, in the actual meaning of the word, you are not stupid. But you've shown much ignorance in this arguement. Does THAT word cover it?"

There for I am not stupid.

-"Ignorance: The condition of being uneducated, unaware, or uninformed."-

How is disagreeing with you being uneducated, unaware, or uninformed?

"I would be INSULTING the members of this board if I said I thought they DIDN'T see your ignorance."

Or I'm not ignorant, and this is another of your lies.

"The way you continue to argue proves otherwise. Either you're lying, or you don't KNOW you're wrong, in which case I REALLY pity you."

Or I am not wrong. Don't leave out possibilities just because they don't support your argument.

"All I admit was that I used the words "idiot" and "thick-headed" incorrectly according to their exact meanings. But w/the way they are used by just about EVERYONE these days, you WOULD BE those things."

The fact that people call pen's (an non-living object) gay (a sexual term), does make them right to do so. You callimg me things (and then saying they are true) when the meaning is clearly different the the way I am acting.

"I've not read a single post of yours that hasn't shown a lack common sense."

Then you obviously don't read many of them.

"Well, you've denied things that are clearly true all through out this thread, so I'd say your own advice would serve you well."

What have I denide that was clearly true?

""Absloute incorrectness" was just my little joke(although if it were a word, it would describe you perfectly)."

Any proof of that?

"I don't HAVE to. Just reading your posts is enough to prove I'm right and you're wrong to anyone w/common sense."

Just reading my posts doesn't prove anything. What is your actual proof you can post here to support you?

"Oh god. I think it proves that you have no real point, seeing that the only arguement you have left is the fact that I technically used words incorrectly, only because thats the way they're used these days. You're trying to make me look completely wrong about EVERYTHING, simply because of my mis-use of 2 words. That is TRULY pathetic."

The fact that your whole argument for these past few days has been based on these incorrectly used terms is my point. And why you are wrong to say they are true.

"They were not lies. They were me using words that are used incorrectly these days to describe you. I, as everyone, wasn't using them to mean their ACTUAL definition. Neither did you, until you realized that you had NOTHING else, and could only delay your inevitable defeat, by looking up their actual meaning in a vain attempt to make me look bad."

They are lies since you were saying they were true when they were not.

"I saw it as an attack."

Then you saw incorrectly.

"my being right is MY BEING RIGHT. And the proof is in YOUR wrong posts."

You keep saying my "wrong posts". Which wrong posts?

"The ACTUAL definitions do not, but the attached meaning of those words THESE days describe you perfectly."

The attached meaning is not relevent.

"You were not aware of? HA! You YOURSELF used the word "idiot" in one of your posts. You KNOW exactly what I meant, and since you couldn't deny THAT, you had to look up the actual meaning."

The fact that you do not care about the actual meaning shows how desperate you are to ignore this fact.

"What we BOTH know I MEANT is very true. Looking up those meanings was quite pathetic, and proved, no matter what you respond to this, that you truly were desperate, and had nothing else."

Or it proves I was tired of you telling "truth" that was not true, and wished to prove your ignorance of the meaning of these words.

"I used them as everyone else, including YOU used them."

And I was incorrect to use it that way, which I admited.

"Yes, they are, and I technically, as everyone, was wrong. But what I MEANT is absolutely correct."

And what did you mean?

"No, I'm jokingly making up definitions to DESCRIBE you. You wouldn't nit-pic like this if you really HAD a good point."

I'm not nit-picing, I'm showing how you called something true that was not.



[This message has been edited by Hans (edited July 12, 2001).]