Alliedassault - View Single Post

pest · 12-25-2004, 09:45 PM

[quote="Jin-Roh":3c317]I have always been told that AMD is best for "cheap" gaming, not so much because of it's performance, but it's cheaper, or something like that. eek:[/quote:3c317]

Yes, but ever since the A64 line came out, AMD has taken over the best gaming at any price and best all round performance at any price titles. And it still offers many of the best gaming values as well. They are the only choice for me.

Things are gonna get uglier for intel before they get better. SLI preformance will probably be better on amd's as well since nvidia doesnt have an nforce chipset. AMD will probably beat them to dual core cpus also.

	(#18)
pest is Offline Senior Member Posts: 2,828 Join Date: May 2002 Location: Buzzin around the dung pile...	12-25-2004, 09:45 PM [quote="Jin-Roh":3c317]I have always been told that AMD is best for "cheap" gaming, not so much because of it's performance, but it's cheaper, or something like that. eek:[/quote:3c317] Yes, but ever since the A64 line came out, AMD has taken over the best gaming at any price and best all round performance at any price titles. And it still offers many of the best gaming values as well. They are the only choice for me. Things are gonna get uglier for intel before they get better. SLI preformance will probably be better on amd's as well since nvidia doesnt have an nforce chipset. AMD will probably beat them to dual core cpus also.