[quote=Quze][quote=Madmartagen]
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by "Duke_of_Ray":56ab7
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by "Unknown_Sniper":56ab7
many people probably forget that bush had no care on earth about iraq when he became president. No one gave a crap about the middle east or al queida. Yes maybe he used the hatred/panic that america was struck with to get permission to do things normally not done but remember he did what everyone wanted. We wanted him to go after Osama, we wanted him to take out sadam because of what he has done in the past and because of what he may have been planning. fact of the matter is yes you can find fault anywhere, yes people always get blamed for their mistakes, for their wrong doings, but when it comes to the good things they have done no one looks or even cares because it doesnt involve lotso f money, blood, or sex.
|
Yes, nobody really cared about the terrorist. Especially Clinton who did nothing at all, thats why 9/11 happend. annoy: |
ummm 9/11 happened 9 months into Bush's term and he had ample time and intelligence to prevent the attacks. Clinton was in power for a few weeks when the WTC was first attacked and the person responsible was caught and sentanced. He also launched missle strikes on areas Bin Laden was thought to have been, so how can you claim Clinton did nothing and come to the conclusion that 9/11 happened because of any lack of effort by Clinton? Also, what has Bush done, Bin Laden is still at large and has had plenty of time to escape.[/quote:56ab7]
He could be dead. But it's not like no one would have taken over.[/quote:56ab7]
Clinton handled the whole OBL thing so poorly and it cost America in the long run. He could have taken Bin Laden out on a few occasions but didnt want the press to have a field day. Bin Laden wasnt a factor when Bush Sr was in office .