Thread: MOh:aim
View Single Post
Old
  (#9)
geRV is Offline
General of the Army
 
Posts: 18,202
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Ireland
   
Default 02-19-2005, 11:56 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by HeadUp
see i still think that moh has better graphics and more realistic models

the only thing is that the gameplay is real weak on mp its not realistic, and ironsights is a good addition
Are you comparing moh to call of duty or pacific assault?

For call of dduty id say definately, the characters in cod look like friggin puppets and run around like they got a 2 foot pole shoved up their ass. Hard to believe most of the same animators that worked on allied assault worked on call of duty, allied assaults animations crap all over cod's and interms of textures and models allied assault > cod.


Pacific assault, lets see they got the quake 3 engine, replaced the renderer with a direct 3d renderer, and for some reason they call it a new engine. oOo:



Anyyway this is what 3 years between allied assault and pacific assault gets you in terms of model improvement.


[img]http://homepage.ntlworld.com/gerald.marley/New%20Folder/choices.jpg[/img]

Not much thats for sure.




Quote:
Originally Posted by Nyck
But one of her fucking grandkids, pookie, rayray or lil-nub was probably slanging weed or rocks out of the house.
  
Reply With Quote