[quote="Sgt>Stackem":46899]
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Tripper
Goddamn that's an ignorant statement if ever I saw one. Our gun laws are similar down here to the UK, and I'll tell you what: It's fucking sweet. Cops don't even need to carry guns. There's pretty much no gun crimes at all.
There's your "nuetered" nation.
|
Main Entry: ig·no·rant
Pronunciation: 'ig-n(&-)r&nt
Function: adjective
1 a : destitute of knowledge or education <an ignorant society>; also : lacking knowledge or comprehension of the thing specified <parents ignorant of modern mathematics> b : resulting from or showing lack of knowledge or intelligence <ignorant errors>
2 : UNAWARE, UNINFORMED
- ig·no·rant·ly adverb
- ig·no·rant·ness noun
synonyms IGNORANT, ILLITERATE, UNLETTERED, UNTUTORED, UNLEARNED mean not having knowledge. IGNORANT may imply a general condition or it may apply to lack of knowledge or awareness of a particular thing <an ignorant fool> <ignorant of nuclear physics>. ILLITERATE applies to either an absolute or a relative inability to read and write <much of the population is still illiterate>. UNLETTERED implies ignorance of the knowledge gained by reading <an allusion meaningless to the unlettered>. UNTUTORED may imply lack of schooling in the arts and ways of civilization <strange monuments built by an untutored people>. UNLEARNED suggests ignorance of advanced subjects <poetry not for academics but for the unlearned masses>.
sorry Holmes, we can agree to disagree on this. It is a PROVEN FACT when the govt comes after your guns your rights are next
PS if I call a cop I want him armed to the teeth[/quote:46899]
You didn't need to post the definition of Ignorant. I know it, and I still standby what I said.
I'm seriously lmfao at this...You think our rights are under threat? Anyone that knows about my country will understand just how nieve that statement is. Proven fact my ass.
....and our cops carry guns in squad cars but don't walk around the streets with guns in holsters unless they're experienced or of certain rank....
Under these rules we don't have any "accidents" where people are shot 40 times for reaching for a wallet by a bunch of rookie cops with itchy trigger fingers...
Cops aren't infallible superhumans. They make mistakes too. It's alot harder to make a fatal mistake when you don't have a gun.
The cops don't need 658678676876 guns because there are VERY few criminals that have access to guns...If that's because of our strict gun laws, who knows....(I'm guessing it is)...
Anyways, as soon as the word "firearm" even enters any kind of call to police, the "armed to the teeth" cops come, The Armed Defenders Squad (Our SWAT equivelent). They rarely need to enter the situation.
...Also, when our criminals have firearms, it's usually antique rifles, hunting rifles or shotguns/sawn offs....And unless you have a huge muther fucking trenchcoat, it's pretty hard to conceal a big fucking musket...Let alone do any damage with it.
We manage pretty well, with around 40 - 60 homicides a year for the ENTIRE nation. I don't even know how many of those would be firearm homicides....Probably no more than 20.... I feel pretty damn safe.
rofl @ rights under threat....
hahahahahahahhahahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaahahahahahaha... ..I would laugh in your face if you said that to me in person....
Now I'm not criticising the U.S here, Instead I'm pointing and laughing at the idea/proposition of the same gun laws being employed in ALREADY "gun safe" places such as the UK, Aussie, NZ, etc....