[quote=Himmler]
Quote:
Originally Posted by geRV
Quote:
Originally Posted by Himmler
Quote:
Originally Posted by geRV
Quote:
Originally Posted by mr.miyagi":44eb4]http://www.zboard.com/us/products/local_assets/BF2.jpg
[url="http://www.eagames.com/official/battlefield/battlefield2/us/downloads.jsp#
http://www.eagames.com/official/battlef ... loads.jsp#[/url]
6 days till demo, Friday....... calmdown:
I should be able to play with most things maxed, Gerv, we expect some exclusive top grade screenies once you get the demo running all maxed out..
Also have to include this:
"To play online, all users will create new user accounts for Battlefield 2, and in creating an account, you are accepting to pay a $15 support charge and follow EA’s Terms and Conditions."
http://www.eagames.com/official/battlef ... ate_060305
|
Ya ill be putting a few up. That 15% charge thing is bugging me though. Charginf monthly for games is something ive never agreed with, its enough that we buy the game why should we have to pay to play as well, not like ea's scraping the barrel for money either.
|
ill show you guys some ss on 1650 x 1080 with max settings biggrin:
|
Good luck trying to play on a 64 player server with those settings happy:
|
im sure it can handle it...might get laggy here and there, but if i can paly hl2 with it all cranked out, it cant be THAT bad[/quote:44eb4]
Well even bfnam can be playable with those settings, for me though if im scoping into an area with a lot of foliage the movement does tend to get sluggish. BF2 has a far longer draw distance than any of the previous bf games, more you can see = the more that has antialiasing applied to it = more framerate loss (assuming you're using fsaa). 1650x1080 with no fsaa would be playable id assume, with it it would degenerate into a slieshow in some situations.