Alliedassault - View Single Post

Coleman · 07-06-2005, 10:14 PM

i'm not following him b/c he wears a Republican nametag. Don't worry about that.

From what I've gathered, his book talked about how women don't have to go out into the work force JUST SOLEY TO GAIN RESPECT socially. He says that there is nothing wrong with a woman being a stay-at home parent. He talked about the radical female rights people and how they do not reflect ALL of society; when much of the media portrays their views as being universally accepted.

video issues
I find nothing wrong with how he defended himself about the girl's question about gay sex/polygomy/incest/etc. I find that legit.

Regarding his views on homosexuals, well I feel as if I'm in the same hemisphere with him rather than being in an opposite pole with someone like Hilary Clinton. What's wrong with having the same views of politician in that regard? I like what he said in response to that second person (dude with the long hair). "You should respect every individual as a person of God, but that does not mean that you have to respect everything they do." or something like that.

With how you believe church and state belongs together...well I'm not sure how much of that is true to that extreme extentwhen you look at his voting record. He has already 'gave in' to the liberal side when it came to school vouchers. He voted against using vouchers (which was one of Bush's big strong points to the conservative party). That's a big criticism by his own party. Saying he's a "bush wannabe" is a stupid thing to say...name calling.

EDIT: I really found nothing wrong with his comments in the video. As for the end, any politician will have his aids defend them at any point in time where a weakness may be exposed. Who wants to look bad from an awkward question? No one. Yes, they had the right to do it and I found nothing wrong with them asking the questions.

	(#4)
Coleman is Offline Major General Posts: 13,482 Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: University Park, PA	07-06-2005, 10:14 PM i'm not following him b/c he wears a Republican nametag. Don't worry about that. From what I've gathered, his book talked about how women don't have to go out into the work force JUST SOLEY TO GAIN RESPECT socially. He says that there is nothing wrong with a woman being a stay-at home parent. He talked about the radical female rights people and how they do not reflect ALL of society; when much of the media portrays their views as being universally accepted. video issues I find nothing wrong with how he defended himself about the girl's question about gay sex/polygomy/incest/etc. I find that legit. Regarding his views on homosexuals, well I feel as if I'm in the same hemisphere with him rather than being in an opposite pole with someone like Hilary Clinton. What's wrong with having the same views of politician in that regard? I like what he said in response to that second person (dude with the long hair). "You should respect every individual as a person of God, but that does not mean that you have to respect everything they do." or something like that. With how you believe church and state belongs together...well I'm not sure how much of that is true to that extreme extentwhen you look at his voting record. He has already 'gave in' to the liberal side when it came to school vouchers. He voted against using vouchers (which was one of Bush's big strong points to the conservative party). That's a big criticism by his own party. Saying he's a "bush wannabe" is a stupid thing to say...name calling. EDIT: I really found nothing wrong with his comments in the video. As for the end, any politician will have his aids defend them at any point in time where a weakness may be exposed. Who wants to look bad from an awkward question? No one. Yes, they had the right to do it and I found nothing wrong with them asking the questions.