Quote:
|
Originally Posted by c312
The administration was told that their were WMDs so that's what they beleived. You can get into whether or not it was a lie, but that is partisan politics more than facts
|
So shouldn't someone be held responsible for their mistake?
[quote:d4810]
I don't see what the pictures are meant to be showing and to tell you the truth, you're right, you're not gonna change my mind and I'm not gonna change yours it just seems weird to me because you are the first person I have encountered that really beleives all this stuff and that America is a bunch of lying manipulative bastards; it's just all very strange for me.[/quote:d4810]
What about if I said many of the hijackers were alive?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle ... 559151.stm
It's unfortunate. People call the US media left wing, but if they were truly left wing, they'd probably show some of these articles.
Maybe they'd show you the second plane impact in slow motion. There's a lot to learn from watching it in slo mo, trust me. It seems they'll give slow mo replays of slam dunks and car crashes, but when it comes down to it, the real stuff they just skip over.
If you happen to ahve any 9/11 DVD's or anything, watch the impact frame by frame. You might be suprised at what you see.
Anyway, the pictures show explosives being discharged. Thats why many people said they heard three explosions and then the building came down. The building was brought down from detonation charges, not fire.