Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Judas
[quote:d064f]If an IQ test is supposed to measure a person's intelligence, the question is: What is intelligence? Is it the ability to do well in school? Is it the ability to read well and spell correctly? Or are the following people intelligent?
The physician who smokes three packets of cigarettes a day?
The Nobel Prize winner whose marriage and personal life are in ruins?
The corporate executive who has ingeniously worked his way to the top and also earned a heart attack for his efforts?
The brilliant and successful music composer who handled his money so poorly that he was always running from his creditors (incidentally, his name was Mozart)?18
The problem is that the term intelligence has never been defined adequately and therefore nobody knows what an IQ test is supposed to measure. In spite of this the futures of thousands of children are determined by the results of this test.
|
[/quote:d064f]
Thats incredibly stupid
We may not always agree on what intelligence is defined as, but we can certainly draw conclusions on what an IQ test measures and predicts. Plain and simple, IQ tests wouldnt exist if they did not relate to performance in the real world, and they DO. Read my post a few up...
We can definitly get into the theories of influential psychologists of the past century to show how bogus that stance is, but I dont really want to relive college pysch....