View Single Post
Old
  (#38)
rdeyes is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1,459
Join Date: May 2003
Location: anchorage,ak
 Send a message via ICQ to rdeyes Send a message via Yahoo to rdeyes  
Default 08-17-2005, 12:26 AM

so the iraqi people were in better shape with saddam in power ? is that you are saying tripper ?

the afghani people were in better shape with the taliban in power ? is that what you are saying tripper ?

saddam used chemical weapons on his own people , invaded kuwait , brutally enforced his rule by murdering people that didnt agree with him, gave his sadistic sons power who in turn murdered and raped people at will. i say the iraqi are alot better without saddam in power

the taliban well thats a story that we all know about, opressed women , enforced the most strictest form of islam ever known to man, harbored a known terrorist that is responisble for the death of 3,000 or more innocent people , i say the afghani people are much better off without the taliban in power.

North Korea , well thats another well known story that kim il jung starves his people while he lives like a king, what good could possibly come from him having any type of nuclear weapons. the US offered to give the north korean people 60 tons of food in exchange for him giving up his nuclear weapon program , but once again he laughed at that.

Iran is lead by a religous zealot that wants to see israel destroyed , i say the world let israel handle this one on their own, they arent in fact trying to build a nuclear bomb even though buttocks posted a article which is nothing short of a lie , they already have nuclear weapons.


cheers beer:
  
Reply With Quote