View Single Post
Old
  (#53)
Stammer is Offline
Captain
 
Posts: 5,021
Join Date: Mar 2005
   
Default 01-31-2006, 05:31 PM

[quote=c312]
Quote:
Originally Posted by "Unknown_Sniper":7b5cc
I actually had a vermont House Rep in my Poli sci class yesterday. From what I understand about what he said, there is a small movement in the government right now to try and impeach bush and cheney. I doubt it will happen but who knows.

Clinton didnt lie under oath. He answered the question in truth but in a bent way. Politics and law need to be worded in such a way as to not allow a way out, however when he was asked if he was involved with Monica the Attourney that asked him asked in such a way that he could say no and he would in fact have been telling the truth if you cared to actually listen.

As for impeaching bush
" Amendment I:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."
According to Dictionary.com
grievĀ·ance ( P ) Pronunciation Key (grvns)
n.
1.
1. An actual or supposed circumstance regarded as just cause for complaint.
2. A complaint or protestation based on such a circumstance. See Synonyms at injustice.
2. Indignation or resentment stemming from a feeling of having been wronged.
3. Obsolete.
1. The act of inflicting hardship or harm.
2. The cause of hardship or harm.

Looks to me that Bush and his buddies fit into just about every Definition of Grievance.
Republican majority. OWNT[/quote:7b5cc]

Doesn't that just make the Republican Mob Bosses? They don't actually care about the people they just care about themselves and the success of the party.
  
Reply With Quote