|
02-07-2006, 09:31 AM
"Designers are aiming for bombs that will be simpler, easier to maintain over decades and, if they fell into terrorists' hands, able to be remotely destroyed or rendered useless"
Easier to maintain, so you wont have nuclear mishaps and disasters and safety devices that can make them useless if fallen into the wrong hands, for example if a nuke sub sank in enemy territory. Its called "improvement" we improved the design of computers, cars, guns, tanks, submarines, everything.
It would also make the bombs less expensive to maintain(which in turn would also decrease the "defense budget" that all you wanks have your panties in a knot about(though I dont know why YOU care what our gov't spends its money on)
Its all research and development of a prototype and/or design not fucking full scale production, 30 years from now is when they [i]might[/] start getting built and please don't think the UK won't be salivating over it as well.
|