Thread: Muhammad owned?
View Single Post
Old
  (#127)
Tripper is Offline
General of the Army
 
Posts: 18,895
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
   
Default 02-10-2006, 12:44 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by interox
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tripper
I don't think it was a smart move. If you want to make things worse and create far more tension - Then do what the europeans did and re-publish the images.

I mean, honestly, if you want to make a point about free speech regarding Islam, was this really the time to make it? I mean the relationship between the middle east and western society is pretty well fucked at the moment, and doing stuff like this at this point in time is making it really bad, and forcing a solid division.

I don't agree with the way they reacted, but then again, I see it as sort of childish to provoke in the way that these newspapers did, and I see it as just plain foolish to do it at this point in time....

What does it prove anyway? I mean it's obvious they have the right to exercise free speech - They don't live in dictatorships - The newspapers would allow them to print, and they know it. So what is the point? Just to spite muslims? Wow, that's a mature way to handle a very tender issue, during a very unstable time.

These people just need to look at the bigger picture - People are getting to involved in picking sides in this thing and not looking out for the greater good.


Another leftwing liberal nancy willing to pamper the fanatics. If anyone wants to print a cartoon depicting anything remotely religous so what? The islam religion is mass hysteria anyway so regardless of any sensible view the fanatics are going to go apeshit defending their faith. It's a simple fact that the western religions have a more tolerant view. Who's provoking who by the way? If you feel cartoons are provocative what the fuck the does robbing a nation [iraq] of its oil make you feel like? Id hate to see you if you spilt some milk. OH THE ANGER.....
Wow what a retarded, senseless mess of words you just made.

I never said I agreed with the reaction of those Muslims - What I DID say is basically that you're asking for it if you provoke these muslims by delibrately reprinting the images inspite (I haven't heard any valid reason for reprinting the image, except to make a "point" about "free speech") of that reaction. Now the editors etc have to go into hiding. I wonder why that is?

The reason why there was such a strong reaction in the middle east over other Muslim areas of the world is because that those muslims are already pissed the fuck off at westerners for all the shit they've been stirring in their countries....

My point is that this came at a REALLY bad time for western-middle eastern relations, and anymore shit like this is going to send the relationship to a place where it can't be sorted out. The fact that the people that reprinted the image did so knowing that is just silly, and foolish - They put all their countrymen at risk just to "make a point."

It may sound like I'm justifying the reaction of the muslims - I'm not. I'm making a point that rather than making attempts to revive the relationship - These people are just making things worse.
  
Reply With Quote