Alliedassault - View Single Post - Pre-War Intelligence a 'Hoax on the American People'

TGB! · 02-11-2006, 11:09 PM

[quote:99f59]1) Does the president not vote?[/quote:99f59]

He is the PRESIDENT - of course he doesnt vote.

[quote:99f59]2&3) Reference Downing Street memos.[/quote:99f59]

Who wrote the Downing Street memo? Where did it orginate? What did my reply say?

[quote:99f59]4) Can't deny many of those who go through S&B as well as other many freemason units are in extremly high places areound the world.[/quote:99f59]

And? It is a PRESTIGIOUS fraternity. . .why WOULDNT the rich and powerful have been in it. Its a strawman (and pretty damn ridiculous) argument. "Oh skull-and-bones - big old conspiracy! Oooga Booga!" Seriously.

[quote:99f59] I don't understand the significance of the DS memo[/quote:99f59]

There is ZERO significance. It is a foreign officials ASSESSMENT of SUPPOSED meetings between American and British officials. . .it is not an indictment of the two admins nor is it in anyway a smoking gun. But of course ANY official who comes out and says so-and-so lied, its treated as FACT, without the same scrutiny that Anti-Iraq-War blubberers seem to apply to other facets of the debate.

	(#25)
TGB! is Offline Command Sergeant Major Posts: 2,644 Join Date: Dec 2003	02-11-2006, 11:09 PM [quote:99f59]1) Does the president not vote?[/quote:99f59] He is the PRESIDENT - of course he doesnt vote. [quote:99f59]2&3) Reference Downing Street memos.[/quote:99f59] Who wrote the Downing Street memo? Where did it orginate? What did my reply say? [quote:99f59]4) Can't deny many of those who go through S&B as well as other many freemason units are in extremly high places areound the world.[/quote:99f59] And? It is a PRESTIGIOUS fraternity. . .why WOULDNT the rich and powerful have been in it. Its a strawman (and pretty damn ridiculous) argument. "Oh skull-and-bones - big old conspiracy! Oooga Booga!" Seriously. [quote:99f59] I don't understand the significance of the DS memo[/quote:99f59] There is ZERO significance. It is a foreign officials ASSESSMENT of SUPPOSED meetings between American and British officials. . .it is not an indictment of the two admins nor is it in anyway a smoking gun. But of course ANY official who comes out and says so-and-so lied, its treated as FACT, without the same scrutiny that Anti-Iraq-War blubberers seem to apply to other facets of the debate.