Alliedassault - View Single Post

Madmartagen · 03-16-2006, 03:34 PM

if theyre worried about severence packages why dont they just reform that? dont companies over here give you severence only if you have been with the company for a year? that 300k doesnt seem right to me. if a third of those jobs wouldnt have been created with the old system, then that would mean that 200k of those jobs would have been created whether the new law was passed or not. the new law created 100k jobs, not 300k.

	(#32)
Madmartagen is Offline Captain Posts: 5,558 Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Anaheim, CA	03-16-2006, 03:34 PM if theyre worried about severence packages why dont they just reform that? dont companies over here give you severence only if you have been with the company for a year? that 300k doesnt seem right to me. if a third of those jobs wouldnt have been created with the old system, then that would mean that 200k of those jobs would have been created whether the new law was passed or not. the new law created 100k jobs, not 300k.