Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Vance
You guys are so naive. The probability of us using a nuke on anyone is practically zero.
|
Naive or not its interesting to see the adminstration contemplating the use of them.
Also:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co ... 82_pf.html
From that:
[quote:e0e44]Unlike the Israeli air attack on Osirak, a strike on Iran would prove more complex because Iran has spread its facilities across the country, guarded some of them with sophisticated antiaircraft batteries and shielded them underground.
Pentagon planners are studying how to penetrate eight-foot-deep targets and are contemplating tactical nuclear devices. The Natanz facility consists of more than two dozen buildings, including two huge underground halls built with six-foot walls and supposedly protected by two concrete roofs with sand and rocks in between, according to Edward N. Luttwak, a specialist at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.[/quote:e0e44]
So if they are to bomb these sites, vance, how do you propose they do it?