
05-20-2006, 12:34 PM
Did I not say in that mistranslation thread you could find another quote where he said something similar? That thread ended and so does this argument. It was one quote thats it. Yes I sit on the left of the spectrum. All I am doing is showing you on the right the other side of this and why they do what they do. Just because I'm showing you something means I advocate it? And I'm not angry because ED "was hitting it close to home" He was far from it in my opinion. I know everyone on the right champions ED and that's why when he says something it seems he speaks for all the conservatives..which, to me, is pretty funny because no one else has a opinion. I have my eyes open and I can look at myself and see that I in no way champion Laden and his rag tag team.
All I am doing is showing all of you what the information I have gathered over the years and placing it the way I see best fit. I in no way am attempting to say one side is better. In general I'd wish terrosim would stop so that everybody can see what the wrongdoings of foreign policy in the ME. But as of now, as all threads have done in the past when the debate shifts from the topic to the individual, this thread is once again showing why everbody thinks I'm wrong and a "idiot". Can one thread be a debate about a topic rather than attacking someones views and integrity? I don't lash out at ED's views saying "A black republican? I've never seen one of those before" or "The right is so stupid and arrogant" Enough is enough we hate each other and that's fine but rather than talk about each other - DEBATE THE ISSUE. That is all I ask. If you look at most of the threads in the past when the debate got heavy it was about the other persons views rather than the topic. One only has to look at the mistranslation thread, which was a mistake to post in the first place. So if anyone has anything relative to the topic then that's fine if not I'm out of here.
|